Hispanics, especially those who are more recent arrivals, give higher ratings in product surveys than their non-Hispanic counterparts, according to a study designed by Jeffry Savitz, President of Savitz Research Companies and Professor of Marketing Research at the University of North Texas. The study found that Hispanics rate products higher than what they may actually feel. In the study, Hispanics and non-Hispanics were asked to assign a numeric value to five rating labels using a scale of 0-100 with 100 being the best. The rating labels, "Excellent," "Very good," "Good," "Neither Good nor Poor" and "Poor" are common in survey research. Hispanics consistently gave higher marks than their non-Hispanic counterparts to each label except "poor." The average difference was 5.9 making it statistically significant.

In this landmark study, Professor Jeffry Savitz a graduate of Columbia University, found that Hispanics rated Tylenol 85.7, significantly higher than non-Hispanics at 80.6 implying Hispanics favor the brand. However, after the adjustment of 5.9 points, the ratings were at parity. Among cellular providers, ratings of Verizon, 65.4 and 68.1, were similar. After the adjustment was applied, however, the ratings indicated that Hispanics do not like this provider nearly as much, 59.5 versus 68.1. In the soft drink category, Hispanics rated Fanta 80.0 versus non-Hispanics at 57.6, a highly significant difference. Even after the adjustment the result was still significant implying Hispanics are more favorable toward Fanta.

The results of the study have significant implications on multicultural advertising and marketing as well as which products and services should be offered to Hispanics. "This study finally sheds light on the reason some Hispanic research ends up with faulty conclusions or results. This 'cultural lift' must be taken into account," says Juan Faura, author of two books on Hispanic marketing. "Hispanics are taught from an early age that it is in poor taste or inappropriate to openly criticize or berate when asked their opinions." Savitz says, "The article discusses levels of acculturation, consumption of Hispanic media and country of origin, but more research is needed to measure the effect of the 'cultural lift' on various categories and other factors."

Hispanicad.com

Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy

http://prsay.prsa.org/index.php/2009/06/05/why-pr-pros-need-access-to-social-media-at-work/

For more information on the show click HERE.

 I think the research conducted by author Natalie Augustin of The Professional Advantage consulting group shows how important it is for managers and staff alike to understand and learn how to bridge the gaps that exist between multiple generations who work together in the same environment. Understanding better the generation traits of your supervisor can help improve your overall effectiveness and relationship with him or her. By the same token, those who supervise others can more effectively manage their staffs by understanding their motivational drivers.

Of course there are a number of other factors that contribute to an effective work group, but knowing, understanding and respecting those things that make each generation a little different from the other, can help get teams to that high performance state that employers seek. 

Will P&G lead the way In Social Media by reinventing Soap Operas?HispanicAd.com, April 29, 2009 For brands, doing social media right will be about telling stories. It will be about blurring the lines between advertising and content. And while there will be an opportunity for brands to attach themselves to stories people choose to share, it's even better when brands help by getting those stories started. This means taking advantage of an old-school marketing playbook: the soap opera.  Recently Dow Jones published a story titled "P&G Puts Added Focus On Digital Media As TV Soap Ends." What's most interesting is that P&G is not winding down its soap opera operations, but rather refocusing those resources on digital efforts. This got me thinking of all the similarities between successful social media marketing and the soap opera. Rather than inserting your brand into someone else's content, the best practices for social media thus far have been to create stories around your brand, making the integration more seamless. The difference, of course, between traditional soap opera and social media is that social media is "participatory." This means that brands won't need to produce stories, as much as they will need to create settings where people will feel compelled to tell their own stories. Another benefit of brands integrating themselves within the content is so they can easily take advantage of the pass-along nature of social media.  So where will the line of responsibility lie between brands and agencies for producing content and facilitating people telling stories? The answer will depend on who more quickly develops expertise and resources for managing social media efforts in an ongoing manner. Rather than looking at a singular campaign concept and staffing for the plan, with an execute and evaluate marketing model, marketers will evaluate how best to develop and manage conversations around their brands. Years ago P&G realized that it would be easier for the company to produce the content itself and then put it on because it gave them the greatest return. Will the story play out the same in social media?

By Joe Marchese, President of socialvibe.
Courtesy of http://www.mediapost.com